A blog about Americans who are in love with someone who is not an American, but cannot sponsor them to come to the United States because they are of the same sex. This blog addresses the grave injustice being done to Lesbian and Gay bi-national couples.
Monday, December 26, 2011
Family Values, High Morals, and Defending Marriage
Why do you suppose these same people refuse to acknowledge the fact that the Bible calls their sins abomination?
Why do you suppose time after time, the same people are brought down for doing things that are less then ethical?
I have two sons.
I believe in family values.
I am married.
I have high morals, I have never cheated on my spouse. I am honest, truthful and a hard worker. I have worked for the same company for 20 years.
I believe in defending marriage. I think that the decline of the family and marriage is appalling.
My family attends church regularly.
My Boys are boy scouts.
They attend AWANA every Monday night.
My boys are both exceptional students with straight A's.
How can people be against my family and my marriage? How can people say that I am not for family values because I am a lesbian? How can people say that I am less than them and that I don't deserve the same rights as a heterosexual couple?
I would like for my marriage to be recognized by the State and Federal governments. I would like to not have to hide my relationship for fear of bullying. I believe that the government is responsible for the bullying of the Lesbian and Gay people because they have not made us equal. Bullies will always pick on someone that they perceive to be inferior to them and the US State and Federal government's failure to recognize us as equal, feeds right into their bullying.
I am not the exception in the Lesbian and Gay community. I am the rule. Our families....our values.... our morals......... We are pro family. We are pro marriage. We are for family values. We would like to be treated equally as our heterosexual counterparts.
How can the US Government refuse my family equal rights and equal protection? To continue to discriminate against us is immoral, anti-family, anti-marriage, and unAmerican.
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Condoning and Promoting Bullying of the LGBT Youth
Condoning the
Bullying
Promoting the
Deaths
Is the US
Government one of the causes of the increase in deaths of the LBGT Youth? Well, as Martin Luther King Jr. said, “In
the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our
friends.”
While we are
doing our best to let our LBGT youth know that “It Gets Better”, The State of Tennessee is passing the
“Don’t say Gay” Law. The law that
states that in the Tennessee schools a person cannot mention that the words
lesbian or homosexual or gay or any other word that has to do with
non-heterosexual orientation. This
promotes shame, hurt, and insecurities.
It also is a way for teens to harass other teens. What in the world are they
thinking?
The United States Congress has had several bills placed before them that would give the Lesbians and Gays some rights. The Uniting American Families Act, the Respect for Marriage Act, and the Reuniting Families Act have all been introduced. They have been refereed to the Judiciary Committee where they have not been brought for a vote. To the General Public this is a sign that Homosexuals do not deserve the consideration of the Government. Shameful that Congress has not gotten the chance to vote on these bills. I believe that this is a sign our children that Lesbian and Gay Youth do not deserve to be protected. They are different and deserve judgement, ridicule and even death. To the Lesbian and Gay Youth it is a sign that they are nothing in the eyes of our government. They are nothing and their death is a favor to society. I am not exaggerating. I was a bullied youth and I know these feelings.
In the State
of Texas, a person can refuse to wait on, to serve homosexuals. Apparently, that is just one of several
states who allow that type of discrimination. I am appalled and shocked that in these
United States would allow such hatred, but then I remember not that long ago,
that the “conservative Christians” were and some still are against interracial
marriage. That the person of color
could be arrested for kissing a white person was not an unusual occurrence. As a matter of fact, that person could
be put to death without the Authorities even wanting to step in. The movie “Holes” starring
Shia
LaBeouf has a story
woven within it about this prejudice.
It is
apparent that we have learned nothing from our past. The conservative Christians (something I
considered myself to be until not that long ago) (I am still Christian just not
all that conservative) refuse to allow for differences. God Almighty has never condemned a
loving same sex relationship, but because of a few verses taken out of context,
we have put people to death.
How can so
many people be so wrong about their interpretation of what the Bible really says
about Homosexuality? I asked a
missionary friend of mine to understand the history, the language, the context
of the verses used to condemn homosexuals and here is what he said: “I do not need know all of that, the
Bible says straight forward etc… etc… etc…” That is the problem. As an example I would like to use the
Ford Truck commercial with Mike Rowe.
The man who tests drives the truck makes the statement, “this truck is
sick”. Do we really think that Ford
would air a commercial where someone says that their truck is horrible? No, we
have to take the context of the statement and the language of the day. He means that the truck is
fabulous. So to those Christians
who refuse to do as I suggested by looking at the context, history, and language
of the day, they have misinformed several generations of people. Please feel free to read and challenge
my personal research on what the Bible really says about homosexuality before
you come to judgment.
Monday, April 11, 2011
Judiciary Committee: Where My Family's Rights go to Die
I now hear rumors that the Uniting American Families Act will be introduced into Congress probably on Thursday. I wish this could make me excited, I wish this could make me happy and hopeful. Unfortunately, all it does is make me sad and wistful. I hope to the Almighty that someone will say, "Wait, stop this bill should not be sent to committee...this bill should be voted on and passed TODAY." That would give me hope, that would be cause for excitement.
Why Congress thinks very little of United States Citizens, I have no idea. We are just asking to be allowed to live in our country with the person that with whom we have fallen in love. It is not evil, it is not a conspiracy, it is not even equal marriage rights. All we, as same sex bi-national couples want, is to be free to live with our spouses without fear of deportation.
I am willing to talk, to debate, or whatever to anyone who has questions, comments and can be helpful in getting this bill passed.
DO NOT LET IT DIE in Judiciary Committee as it has for the last 10 years. Please, our families depend on it to be able to be together, live in peace and be free.
Friday, March 25, 2011
Sodom and Gomorrah All Over Again???
I would like to use this in another manner: I would like to use this as an example of what took place in Sodom and Gomorah. These men that attacked and raped Joe Rodriguez were doing it to punish him not because they were gay and wanted to have gay sex. It was mob mentality. This is exactly the same thing that expert theologians believe took place in Sodom and Gomorrah.
The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were having problems with spies from other countries infiltrating their cities. A common way to punish them was to treat them "like women" and rape them as if they were women.
This is for those of you who still think God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because of homosexuality. Look beyond what you have been told and investigate for yourself. Before you say "Amen" when you go to sleep at night ask God to show you the truth.
We who are in a same sex relationship are not living in sin because of that relationship. We are not evil and an abomination to God. I ask you to continue to read this blog to see exactly what the Bible says about homosexuality and same sex relationships.
Joe Rodriguez was discharged under DADT. I know it may be tough to be a young gay person. I know it’s hard to have to hide your true essence and live a happy childhood and be who you really are. I understand it’s hard to have to hide in front of family and friends as you grow up to be the man or woman God brought into this world. I ask you to keep faith and not give in to all the bullying and harassment.I was once in the closet, just like you, and felt the pain and mental anguish of hiding who I really was until my 28th birthday last year.
I was raped by a group of men in June 2008 while I was still in the Navy. My fellow sailors then perceived me to be gay, and harassed me because of the rape at the hands of other men. They were right – I was a gay man, yet I did not deserve to be treated in a hateful manner. But I stood strong and I am winning the battle now. I ask you to do the same.
I understand how you feel, but I beg you to please not give up. Please stand strong and DEMAND EQUALITY. You are all God’s children and he loves us all!! You are beautiful to everyone. We are not different. We are just a little more special, because God made us special, with love, and with love to give. You are beautiful in my eyes and everyone’s eyes. LIVE WITH PRIDE AND LIVE IN YOUR TRUE ESSENCE! I love you all, and please don’t give up. You are the ones coming up in the world and we need a strong generation for years to come. We are not weak. So please, be patient and stand up with pride and fight for your equality!
Sincerely, US NAVY Gay Veteran Jose A. Rodriguez .
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Let's Keep it Going, Let's Get This Done!
The 2011 bill was introduced by U.S. Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York on March 16, 2011, and had 108 original cosponsors. A U.S. Senate version was introduced by Dianne Feinstein of California on the same day and had 18 original cosponsors.
Paul Schindler with Gay City News:
It what appears to be the first such action of its type, an Immigration Judge in Manhattan has adjourned deportation proceedings for the Argentine lesbian spouse of an American citizen to allow the couple to proceed with their application to have their marriage recognized for purposes of federal immigration law.
Monica Alcota, 35, who came to the US a decade ago, married her partner of nearly three years, 25-year-old Cristina Ojeda, last August in Connecticut.
The couple’s attorneys, Lavi Soloway and Noemi Masliah, argue that their clients’ marital status should qualify Alcota for permanent residency, as would be the case with any different-sex couple.
A 2010 US court ruling striking down the Defense of Marriage Act’s denial of federal recognition for legal same-sex marriages, they say –– coupled with the Justice Department’s recent decision that it could not and would not defend DOMA’s constitutionality on that point –– opens up the real possibility that Alcota and Ojeda may be accorded recognition.
In a March 22 hearing in the US courthouse at 26 Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan, Immigration Judge Terry A. Bain gave the couple the go-ahead to press their claim with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) –– a unit of the Department of Homeland Security –– through what is known as Form I-130, a petition to have Alcota recognized as “the spouse of USC.”
For now, the couple’s case has been adjourned until December, a decision supported by the government's attorney.
“It is almost impossible to overstate the significance of what happened in there,” Soloway said immediately after the hearing. “An adjournment based on an I-130. It would never have happened a year ago. I don’t think I even would have filed it.”
Describing the development as “huge,” Soloway also credited Bain with being “very kind, very generous” in her handling of the case.
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) is fighting for the rights of bi-national gay and lesbian couples who could otherwise be torn apart by deportation proceedings. Nadler Communication Director Ilan Kayatsky told Raw Story Wednesday that the congressman was planning on re-introducing the Uniting American Families Act -- legislation that aims to provide immigration equality to bi-national same sex couples.
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) is fighting for the rights of bi-national gay and lesbian couples who could otherwise be torn apart by deportation proceedings.
Nadler Communication Director Ilan Kayatsky told Raw Story Wednesday that the congressman was planning on re-introducing the Uniting American Families Act -- legislation that aims to provide immigration equality to bi-national same sex couples.
News of Nadler's plan comes a day after Immigration Judge Terry A. Bain halted deportation proceedings against Monica Alcota, a citizen of Argentina, while her wife, Cristina Ojeda, moves forward with a green card petition on her behalf.
It was the first time a married same sex couple had successfully argued that a pending deportation should be halted based on the Obama administration's decision to no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
"In light of these developments, Judge Bain's decision to stop deportation proceedings and allow Monica Alcota and Cristina Ojeda to seek recognition of their marriage was the right, necessary, and just thing to do," Nadler said Wednesday.
"Our immigration laws protect families by allowing spouses of United States citizens to remain in the country. No family or committed couple should be needlessly torn apart while we work to bring a final end to this shameful law," he added.
Kayatsky said that Nadler had been introducing related legislation for over ten years.
"He got interested a while back when he found out about and met couples who fell into that category -- one partner was from another country and because they were barred from being legally married, they could not sponsor the foreign partner for immigration purposes just like straight couples can," he explained.
"It struck him as a gratuitously cruel and unnecessary part immigration law -- something that probably wasn't foreseen when the immigration laws were being drafted and that really served no purpose in federal law. It simply discriminated against gay and lesbian couples and punished families and committed couples, which is precisely the opposite of how federal law should be envisioned."
With the administration's decision to no longer defend DOMA, Nadler anticipates even more challenges to deportation proceedings, Kayatsky said.
"There's a big chink in the wall now that the court has declared DOMA is unconstitutional and the Department of Justice has agreed," he continued.
"For the congressman and for people on this side, it's really disappointing that Republican leaders of the House rushed into the matter, announcing their intention to defend DOMA in court... and they did so without really taking a fresh look at the facts," Kayatsky added.
Nadler has already re-introduced the Respect for Marriage Act -- to completely undo DOMA. Kayatsky expected him to re-introduce the Uniting American Families Act "soon."
Next, on the 24th of March, we learned that supporters of repealing the Defense of Marriage Act are calling on the Senate to hold hearings on the impact the denial of the federal benefits and responsibilities of marriage is having on married same-sex couples throughout the United States.
All of this is a lot to take in as it has all happened in the last few weeks. Right now we need to keep the momentum going. If you do not know how, I will post links at the bottom of this page of who to contact for information on how you can become involved in making our voices heard in Congress. Let's Get this DONE!!
GLAA - Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance
Equality Matters
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
The Bible Says - Homosexuality
Homosexuality
What does the Bible Say?
Each and Every Verse the Text and the Context
The Culture and the History of the Time
(There are only six by the way)
Let's start with the big one: Leviticus 18:22 Do not lie with men as you would with women.
Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood be upon them
In order to understand these verses, one must understand the culture of the time. In reading the entire chapters, we are told three different times that they were being forbidden to live as the Egyptians and the Canaanites. Biblical historians will tell you that the Cannanite religion during this time also included sexual rites. These were done to ask for the blessings of their god. These sexual rites included whole families; Husbands, wives, cousins, mothers, daughters, nieces and nephews. Also included in the rites were temple prostitutes. Every kind of sexual practice was going on when worshiping these gods during this time including homosexual sex. They felt that having physical contact with the priests of the gods and goddesses would bring them blessings. Sexual intercourse was felt to gain great favor of the goddess because the male was offering his semen, thought to be the essence of life, to the goddess through the priest. Depositing semen in the body of the priest was believed to be the way to eternal life. Similar practices went on during this time in history through out the religion in worship of pagan deities.This is what was going on in Canaan and Egypt at the time the Levitical rules were announced --homosexual temple prostitution. And as already noted, Leviticus 18 and 20 specifically say that they were written to address pagan religious practices.
Leviticus 18 begins (18:3) You shall not do as they do in the land of Egypt, where you lived, and you shall not do as they do in the land of Canaan where I am bringing you...
Leviticus 20 is even more specific even naming the pagan god Molech.
So these verses which are quoted so often in condemnation of homosexuality, are actually in condemnation of idol, false god pagan practices.
************************************************************************************************************
Sodom and Gomorah in Genesis 19
For years, this has been used by people to condemn homosexuality. Let's look at the story a little more closely. The Bible says that all the men of the city every single one of them both young and old came to Lot's house. This is very telling. The most "gay" city in the United States is arguably San Fransisco. Yet, in this very "gay" city, less than half of the men are gay. It stands to reason that if the Bible was talking about homosexuals, perhaps it would have been worded that "certain men of the city" or even "many men of Sodom". It is not. It says that every single one of the men and boys .... all of them to the very last man came to Lot's house. To suggest that every single man in Sodom and Gomorrah was a homosexual is simply not credible. From where did the children come if this was so. I believe that something other than homosexual desire was going on here. This is further proved accurate by Lot himself. He offers his daughters, his virgin daughters to the men of Sodom and Gomorrah. If these men were truly homosexual, what was Lot trying to accomplish here. Lot knew the men at his door and knew them to be predominately heterosexual (his actions are reprehensible) which is why he offered his daughters.
From ancient records, we know that at the time, the practice of the people of Sodom and of all the people of the area was to use rape of men by men to humiliate them. "When victorious soldiers wanted to break the spirit of their defeated enemies, they would 'treat them like women'". This is a story of mob violence, not of homosexual desire.
So if homosexuality was not the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah, what was it that caused God to rain fire and brimstone. Well, once again, the Bible has the answers to this. The Bible itself tells us that it was not homosexuality that caused God to destroy these two cities. The Bible mentions Sodom and Gomorrah twenty times in later scriptures and NONE of them states that their sin was homosexuality. In the book of Ezekiel we find probably the most extensive references to Sodom and Gomorrah. Ezekiel 16:49 & 50 This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. They were haughty and did abominable things before me; therefore I removed them when I saw it.
According to the Old Testament prophets, the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was the fact that they behaved with "callous indifference" to those in need-- the widows, orphans, poor and the strangers in their midst. In truth, this story is at best a condemnation of homosexual rape; and as other Scriptures affirm, it is more generally a condemnation of the mistreatment of those who are most vulnerable .... It is ironic that the story of Sodom is now used by Christians to justify judgement toward another vulnerable group -- homosexuals. [excerpt from The Children are Free by Rev. Jeff Miner and John Tyler Connoley]
***************************************************************************************************
Romans 1:21-28
(King James Version)
21Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23And changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things.
24Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves:
25Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.
28And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
The apostle Paul is addressing the Roman people. All accounts of this passage that I have studied (and there were a lot) agree on one thing. Paul is talking to these people about idol worship. God gives them over to their idol worship and the practice of homosexual relations in said pagan rituals. That each of them agree upon.
1:24-25 The expression God gave them (parevdwken aujtouV" oJ qeov", paredoken autous ho theos) over means that the process envisioned in 1:18-32 is not simply the natural course of events but an ongoing history directed by a sovereign God who makes decisions which affect people, societies, and cultures. The thought is truly a frightful one. It is reminiscent of Pharaoh turning his back on God and in turn having his heart judicially hardened by YHWH (Exod 9:16; cf. Rom 9:17).
Though there is no mention of fire and brimstone at this point in Romans, there is a process underway that is not altogether distinct from hell. If people really want their sinful lifestyles, then the awesome reality is God will give them over to it. As C. S. Lewis as aptly remarked, “There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, ‘Thy will be done.’ All that are in hell chose it.” The point is, that although Paul is not talking about hell here, and indeed there is still hope for these people, there is nonetheless a continuum between their present existence and their future plight. If a person really wants God out of their thoughts, as these people most definitely do, Love has decided to provide a place in the end where they can choose to go and never have to think about him again.
There comes a time in the divine mind when people, who revel in the sinful desires of their hearts, are to be handed over to their desire for impurity, in particular, to the dishonoring (tou` ajtimavzesqai) of their bodies with one another. One should not miss the ideological connection here between the Gentiles’ idolatry and sexual sin—a connection which was commonly made in the Judaism of Paul’s day.
Wisdom of Solomon 14:12-14 reads: 12For the idea of making idols was the beginning of fornication, and the invention of them was the corruption of life; 13 for they did not exist from the beginning, nor will they last forever. 14 For through human vanity they entered the world, and therefore their speedy end has been planned (NRSV).
Though there is no explicit grammatical tie with verse 24, verse 25 makes it clear that sexual perversion is closely linked with idolatry. People have exchanged (methvllaxan, metellaxan) the truth about God’s existence and glory for the lie that he neither exists nor merits worship. Indeed, the irony of the whole thing is that they give religious worship and service to this lie (tw/` yeuvdei, to pseudei) when they give themselves to idolatry—the worship of the creation rather than the Creator. For idolatry is not just the worship of useless idols, it is the express proclamation that the biblical God does not exist. Such a thought is so abhorrent to Paul that he finds it necessary to invoke a blessing on God: “God is forever blessed!”
Study By: Greg Herrick from Bible.org
The Apostle Paul was a very educated man. He addressed the facts of the time in a very logical and throughal progression.
1. In verse 21 he addresses People who refuse to acknowledge and glorify God
2. In verse 23, they were worshipping idols
3 They were interested in earthly things rather than the things of the Creator (verse 25)
4. Gave up natural passion for the opposite sex in an "unbounded search for pleasure"
5. Lived lives full of covetousness, malice, envy, strife, slander, disrespect for parents, pride and hatred for God
The model of homosexual behavior that Paul is addressing here is explicitly associated with idol worship (probably temple prostitution), and with people who, in unbridled search for pleasure (or because of religious rituals associated with their idolatry), broke away from their natural sexual orientation, participating in promiscuous sex with anyone available. Paul simply does not address the issue of a stable, loving homosexual relationship among people of faith.
[exerpt from The Children are Free by Rev. Jeff Miner and John Tyler Connoley]
****************************************************************************************
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 and I Timothy 1:10 (King James Version)
9Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
1 Timothy 1:10 (King James Version)
10For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
In the Greek effeminate is malakoi - according to several Greek translations this means soft. Upon further study I discovered that it refers to being "soft like a woman." When used in the context of morality, the following meanings could be put upon the word: "Lazy, coward or lack of courage, over indulgence..."
From this perspective, Paul was condeming men who were vain fearful and self indulgent. In another perspective, malakoi could possibly be speaking of a male prostitute who would have served as the receptive partner in sexual intercourse.
********************************************************************************************
Why Then Do So Many People Misinturpret The Bible's Meanings
For These Verses and Homosexuality
Well, quite frankly people don't have a vested interest in proving what centuries of people have said to be true...to prove them wrong. It wasn't until gay and lesbian theologians and their friends were able to step out of the closet and practice as open and affirming people, that these passages were looked into more deeply and with much greater interest. Thanks to efforts of these people we have a better understanding of the precise meaning of these passages. The good news of the Bible is still for all because none of these passages condemn a loving same sex relationship.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Ninety-six percent of the USA People are Ignorant About Immigration
I have been petitioning Congress on a daily basis through twitter and have gotten a few responses. When I ask Congress to support the Uniting American Families Act, I have been told they don't support it because they are for traditional marriage. The Uniting American Families Act has nothing to do with marriage. It is about me being able to sponsor my same sex partner for immigration. It is about putting families back together. It is about giving homosexuals the right to live in their own country with the person they love.
I have seen that people already think that the homosexual community has equal rights and they feel that we are asking for special treatment. I was flabbergasted that anyone could say that we have the same rights. Heterosexual people can get married just about anywhere in the world and the Federal government will recognize that they are married. I can get married in a state that allows same sex marriage and the Federal government will not recognize it at all. As a matter of fact, I can go to the next state and my marriage does not exist.
I believe that before one starts making judgment calls on the Uniting American Families Act, they are in serious need of education. I was told that before we pass any "amnesty" acts, we need to secure our borders. The Uniting American Families Act is not an amnesty bill. Secure our borders. Heck, yes! Build a wall if you want to. I am an American citizen. I love the United States of America. I am only asking that the person with whom I fell in love be allowed to immigrate to the United States of America. I am not asking for special favors. I am not asking for special treatment. I am only asking that we pass the Uniting American Families Act.
What good is it to keep us apart. I was born in the United States of America. I am just wanting to stay here, rear my children with my spouse. I have been told that maybe I need to move to my spouse's country. I have been at my job for 20 years. I own a house. Our boys do not speak the language of my spouses country. I do not speak the language of my spouses country. I am a productive member of society. I have been told I can just leave...and do what? Go on welfare in my spouses country? Become a burden to their society? I would have to learn the language and then find a new line of work as they do not have Respiratory Therapists in her country.
Pass the Uniting American Families Act. Please end this grave injustice being done to American citizens and their partners. It is wrong that we cannot live in the country of our choice with the person of our choice because we are of the same sex. It is evil and it is a horrible and grave punishment to those who have done nothing wrong.
So before we listen to people making flippant comments. Please remember that most of them are just regurgitating ignorance of a system they know very little... if anything...about. We are Americans. We don't want special treatment, however, equal treatment would be nice.
Please, let's get the Uniting American Families Act Passed!